Those critics who actually believed Donald Trump’s travel ban was unconstitutional, an unprecedented hate crime against humanity, were clearly duped by the same “Russian Conspiracy” hysteria that has triggered mourning millennials into licking toilet seats or pledging to remove their beta-male genitalia for proper submission to alpha-Islamic jihadists. And for the record, October’s hearing is but a formality otherwise the Supreme Court would have clashed over maintaining the Appeal’s Court ruling. If the President was guilty of anything, other than opposing the reckless immigration policies of his anti-American predecessor, it was for exercising the same authority and discretion Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, and Jimmy Carter invoked to restrict travel from specific nations or populaces without any such opposition from their fellow constituents; most notably, those Democratic officials who encouraged partisan judges to “resist” explicit law in favor of pursuing personal vendettas over an election result. Despite the fact these individuals knew Trump’s travel ban was completely legal and historically relevant, their intent was to once again fabricate the appearance of scandal – using mass media to paint the President as a reckless supremacist mired in Executive overreach – with the real goal of delaying his order or defeating his resolve to implement such a “controversial” action. And here I thought the safety and security of the American people, not childish games and political sabotage, were of paramount importance to our elected officials.
Immigrants, especially those hailing from known tumultuous regions, can no more dictate the terms of their entry into a foreign country than a child can choose his or her biological parents. Unless “Give Terrorism a Chance” is America’s new lottery motto, did 9/11 and the over 90 terrorists incidents perpetrated on American soil since that horrific day never happen or are we still debating whether knives, guns, trucks and planes murder the “infidel”? Has the new European playground of militant Islam sounded any bells of civilized concern over unvetted radicals or are “We the People” still believing “moderate” Muslims share our values, respect human rights and possess a mutual commitment to the survival and sovereignty of America? The reason Poland and Japan have not become a complicit statistic is because both refuse to accept refugees and believe there is a direct correlation between Islamic terrorism and Islamic immigration. Yes, logic burns the ill-prepared, or more specifically, the powdered blue ploys of electoral supremacy. Apparently the progressive brain trust of “Pelosi and Schumer” did not share that memo because plotting globalists must extinguish the light of liberty before their victims can read the paper it’s printed on.