Peter Strzok – a vocal, anti-Trump, FBI agent who praised resisting DOJ holdovers like Sally Yates criminally leaking classified information, was allowed to question General Flynn and fraudulently changed the concluding remarks of the fake Hillary email investigation from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless” – was a senior lieutenant on Mueller’s partisan hit squad. He was only recently dismissed after his duplicitous ties and nefarious motives were publicly revealed.
Andrew Weissmann, a lawyer currently aiding Mueller’s Russian witch hunt to unearth any discernible crumb of vaguely interpreted indiscretion, was invited to and attended a Hillary election party in New York City.
Another attorney, Aaron, Zebley, the same accessory who represented the infamous Clinton IT specialist and who actually physically smashed evidence to protect Hillary, is also assisting Mueller and Comey’s vindictive campaign to evict Donald Trump by fabricating election collusion. He is still an active participant in the never-ending probe despite his obvious conflict of interest.
Robert Mueller’s “grounds for impeachment” inquisition is so hopelessly biased and fatally compromised that no matter how many indictments he issues or what his final conclusions may be, any sane court of law would immediately invalidate the findings over a clear unethical breech of legal protocol and for failing to provide an objective, fair evaluation of evidence, subpoenaed testimony and wrongfully targeted suspects.
How dangerous and incestuous has the Deep State community become? So corrupt that the FBI knowingly accepted/conspired on the creation of a fake Russian dossier to help the NSA obtain a surveillance warrant under false pretenses so the Obama administration could spy on a Presidential candidate and his transition team for the explicit purpose of attempting to frame an innocent man solely to overturn an election result and thwart his “America First” agenda. If treason and sedition are still crimes, there are more than one pair of handcuffs lacking an accomplished felon.
For the over 2 billion Christians around the globe, Christmas is a sacred celebration marking the birth of our savior, Jesus Christ. It has also become increasingly synonymous with commercialism, materialism, and the almighty power of the dollar. Now before you sense a lengthy diatribe against greed or self-indulgence, my answer may honestly surprise you. I personally do not have a problem with gift-giving as long as these traditions are put in proper context. Charity is not only a virtue but one of humanity’s most redeeming qualities when it is done strictly from a standpoint of love, altruism, rather than the jaded expectation of reciprocal reward. I do freely admit many children have lost sight of what Christmas embodies – God’s undying love for mankind, his children, and that of his only begotten son – but many have not been properly taught, and two, well, they’re kids. It is neither insidious or unnatural to be excited by the prospect of receiving presents for they fill our hearts with both joy and wonder. However, above all else, we should be even more enthusiastic and grateful for those everyday blessings present in our lives – the lifelong love of supportive parents, a caring and faithful spouse, healthy children, and the basic amenities of food, shelter, education – modern complacency too often takes for granted or freely expects.
And yes, even when people lack any of these invaluable necessities and struggle to overcome such trying tribulations, we as Americans must never forget to give thanks for the divine gift of liberty, an eternal light conceived in God’s compassion and grace, which warns ours senses and strengthens our hearts against hate, cruelty and depravity. For no matter how bleak or barren tomorrow may seem, America offers a bounty of self-fulfilling opportunity, generosity and level of hope from despair that millions throughout the world, still to this day, can scarcely imagine.
As someone who truly rejoices in the festive revelry of the Holiday season, a virtuous reminder of personal rebirth and redemption that should last throughout the year, there is no greater gift than human empathy…most notably, a genuine concern for the well-being of family, neighbors and complete strangers. Muddled in the hustle and bustle of our own daily lives, our growing impatience and demand for satisfaction, society is too easily blinded or even numb to the struggles of our fellow brethren. As we are increasingly consumed by modern contrivances and hoarded possessions, there are countless souls who have never known love, who cannot escape the ravages of disease, who sleep in abandoned warehouses or parked cars in the dead of winter, who frequently go to bed hungry, are sexually abused by supposed figures of trust, or lack the support to overcome loss, domestic violence, depression and substance abuse. To these forgotten or falsely stereotyped individuals, the slightest hint of compassion or a kind face with whom to share their feelings – perhaps a cup of coffee, a phone call for help made on their behalf or a warm embrace – exceeds the dollar amount of any highly coveted, mass marketed, commercial item.
Making a lasting difference in the world, endeavoring to walk in the benevolent footsteps of Christ, begins by teaching our children the greatest act of charity is their time, humanity, forgiveness and willingness to think of others before themselves. And although it is true I believe no child should go without a present or a family’s love on Christmas day, I gain far more satisfaction from giving to and helping others than any ornate present I may receive. Whether volunteering to feed the homeless, befriending an orphan in foster care or donating services to a senior citizen in need, hope resides in our capacity to embody charity, spread good will and cheer, each and every ordinary day of the year.
I hate to burst your pompous bubble wrap, Al Franken, but you personally admitted to sexually harassing\assaulting women after irrefutable evidence surfaced of your vile behavior. Unlike your woefully insincere apology and your party’s clearly calculated attempt to claim the moral high ground, your resignation was more than warranted. Roy Moore and President Trump, on the other hand, were clearly targeted by an orchestrated wave of unsubstantiated accusations just weeks before their respective elections. Not only was no credible proof offered and not one criminal charge filed, Gloria Allred represented nearly every so-called victim: many of whom had direct ties to the Democratic Party, a history of false allegations or later admitted to being contacted as potential accusers. Despite your spiteful and vindictive claims, wishful thinking or private “locker room talk” does not constitute actually physically groping, kissing or repeatedly harassing another human being against his or her will. Unless innocence is no longer presumed in a court of law and guilt pardoned from any required burden of proof, I’m going to have to ask you to check your diaper. America is sick of your delusional and divisive stench.
For the sake of posterity, not indulging the baseless claims of revisionists and anti-Christian antagonists, I’ll try to be as credibly concise as possible. The theological, geographic roots of Judaism stretches back over four thousand years – or three times greater than the first documented revelations of Mohammad – and Canaan, better known as modern-day Israel, represents a covenant between God and Abraham to consecrate a “Holy Land” for a “sacred” people. Likewise, the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem to his transcendent Sermon on the Mount near the Sea of Galilee until his mourned crucifixion in Golgotha, the divine source for our natural born rights, serves as the moral basis of our Constitutional charter and the very ideological foundation of Western Civilization itself. To claim Islam or modern-day “Palestinians” have any legitimate claim over Israel’s ancestral homeland, the newly and rightfully recognized capital of Jerusalem itself, is to disregard history itself.
In 624 AD, Mohammed plundered an Arabic caravan and murdered 70 Meccans for material gain. Between 630 and Mohammed’s recorded death in 632 AD, Muslims conquered the bulk of Western Arabia and southern Palestine through approximately a dozen separate invasions and bloody conquests. These clashes were in large part “Holy Wars”, debunking the popular myth the Crusades were “The First Holy War”, as if Christians nefariously invented the mere concept of religious conflict. Immediately following Mohammed’s fall, the new Muslim caliph, Abu Bakr, launched Islam into nearly 1,500 years of perpetual imperialism through invasion, war and forced subjugation; a blueprint Islam still follows to this very day.
The lust for Muslim conquest stretched from southern France to the Philippines, from Austria to Nigeria, central Asia to New Guinea and included over 1,000 incursions into Europe alone which predated the onset of the “Crusades”; that infamous Christian “Holy War” which is routinely depicted by academia as an unprovoked campaign of intolerant, brutal aggression. While I will not deny the fighting was undeniably vicious and some European armies made no distinction between Muslims and Jews, the Crusades were clearly calculated reciprocity, not unsolicited hostility.
Headquartered in Arabia, the Muslim goal was to first erect a central government in Damascus, followed by Baghdad and later at Cairo, Istanbul or any other advantageous Islamic center. The local governors, judges, of these distant colonies were appointed by central authorities, Islamic law was introduced as the absolute decree of their newfound rulers. In essence, two classes emerged in these newly captured territories: the native, tax-paying residents and their colonialist dictators…the Islamic Caliphate.
Predominantly populated by Jews and Monophysite Christians, “Palestine”, the prophesied “Promised Land”, was the first Western, non-Arab region invaded by Muslim imperialists. At the time, Palestine was in great decline under the rule of the Byzantine or Eastern Roman Empire, a Greek speaking people. The Muslim annexation of Palestine began with the battle of Yarmouk in August of 636 AD with an estimated 75,000 soldiers. With the help of local Jews who initially welcomed the Muslims as liberators due an underlying hatred of their current despotic leaders, these Islamic invaders eventually conquered the remainder of Palestine but were unable to capture Jerusalem. Beginning in July 637, Muslims laid siege to Jerusalem, which lasted for five months, and concluded with its surrender in February 638 AD. And although Arabs did not ransack the esteemed city, the attack was but a taste of Islamic tyranny which in due time would illustrate many trademarks of Muslim oppression. In short, only Christian and Jewish people were made to pay tributes and neither could bear arms, ride horses, proselytize (preach their faith) or build without Muslim permission. Baghdad also used these colonial wars of conquest to provide the Caliphate with a steady stream of slaves, many of whom were turned into eunuchs.
Beginning in 725 AD, after nearly a century of Muslim occupation, the centralized Islamic government was subverted by a rise in extremist factions which deemed Arabic the official language, demanded the conversion of all “infidels” to Islam, and systematically drained the wealth and economic vitality of Jerusalem. In approximately 750, the reigning Caliph destroyed the walls of Jerusalem, leaving it defenseless, only to later be rebuilt in time to defend against the Crusaders. During this period, Jerusalem and its Christian/Jewish majority suffered greatly during alternating periods of peace and war. The countryside of Israel (970-983 AD) and that of Jerusalem (1024-1077 AD) was repeatedly laid waste and local resources pilfered. The Caliphate ordered the wholesale destruction of Christian churches – although Islamic mobs independently unleashed their own ruinous wrath – and in 1020 the Caliph of Cairo ordered the cultural genocide of Jerusalem by building small Mosques over existing Christian churches, robbing Christian pilgrims traveling from European countries and by attacking Christian processions in its city streets.
Not until 1099 AD or after roughly 450 years of uninterrupted Muslim rule was Jerusalem briefly recaptured before changing hands on numerous other occasions. All in all, Jerusalem has been destroyed at least twice, besieged (surrounded) 23 times, attacked on 52 separate instances, and captured/recaptured an astounding 44 times. The “City of David” – including Eastern Jerusalem’s subsequent Christian proliferation and the West Bank remnants of Islamic infiltration – was not fully returned to the rightful descendants of Abraham until the victorious culmination of the Six Day War in 1967 when Israel decisively repelled the combined advances and undying aspirations of Jordan, Syria, and Eqypt. Furthermore, a number of today’s self-proclaimed “Palestinians” currently occupying the Gaza Strip, the same archaic militants defined by incessant depravity, are most likely the direct descendants of 12th century, seaborne Philistines indoctrinated into conquering Islamic tribes.
For those anti-American apologists who adamantly disagree with President Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and the proper home for our foreign embassy, claiming it will destabilize the Palestinian “peace process” and compromise their right to a sovereign homeland, please allow my “Islamophobia” to digress. The very basis of Islam is the unconditional submission and forced conversion of non-believers. Nothing during the past 1500 years has led mankind to believe their sordid mission has changed or reconciled the Q’uran’s belligerent teachings, inhumane practices, with the societal values of the civilized world. Even during the renovation of Jerusalem’s famed walls and city infrastructure under Suleiman the Magnificent, the occupation by the Ottoman Turks between the 16th and 19th centuries, the subsequent rise in Mosques and Islamic symbols were specifically commissioned to commemorate a “great victory” over a conquered indigenous people and their native religion. Assimilation was little more than a sharpened ultimatum without an address.
“Peace and Palestinian sovereignty” is an oxymoronic fallacy that is as prevalent in anti-Semitic circles as it is historically obtuse. After all, when the Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar II pillaged Jerusalem and its sacred Temple – one of three great exoduses of Israelites into Egyptian bondage – it was populated by Jews, not Palestinians. Why, you ask? Because “Palestinians” were not invented yet. Yes, I concur, a most troubling revelation. Regardless of these omitted facts and the Islamic incarnation of such cultural misappropriation, America and Israel are forever intertwined by an unbreakable premise. America was established upon the moral cannon of Judeo-Christian principles – the indelible ideal our Constitution was forged solely for a moral and religious people – and the Biblical account Christians are called upon to defend the “Holy Land” for God’s “chosen people”; or more succinctly, the salvation of all mankind.
How are you not guilty of murder, let alone involuntary manslaughter from “accidental negligence”, when there’s a dead body, gunshot residue on your hand and you admit firing the weapon that killed her; a firearm stolen from a federal agent, no less? When political hearsay replaces logic and common sense becomes a micro-aggression! Apparently if you’re an illegal immigrant living in California, shielded by the sheer lunacy of Sanctuary Cities, the law is secondary to the warped perceptions of bitter social anarchists. It’s obvious a sizable percentage of judges and jurors are incapable of delineating fact from identity victimization propaganda; i.e., the growing mindset in extremely progressive states that politics trump judicial obligation because illegals are obviously helpless victims of a racist American society and therefore worthy of special considerations. Sorry to disgrace the “honorable” court but “intent” does not magically exonerate criminals from the consequences of their actions.
A conviction of guilt doesn’t require three bystanders filming a suspect standing over a bleeding body while holding a smoking gun. You simply have to prove there is no other likely, plausible explanation within the scope of the evidence at hand. Regardless of your personal opinion of the verdict, the fact liberals are rejoicing over this historic injustice, claiming Kate’s Law should now be nullified to allow similar future tragedies, illustrates just how shameless, morally bankrupt and dangerous the left has become in the wake of such a senseless loss. It’s painfully absurd to call yourself a “feminist” or a champion of women’s rights after celebrating the unpunished murder of a callously marginalized life.
Sorry to disappoint the Jose Garcia Zarate fan club, but I never viewed our legal system as a color-coded game of partisan contempt – white versus black, man versus woman, Christian versus atheist, Democrat versus Republican. Rather, I recognized the concept of “justice” as the most sacred duty of a sovereign, constitutional republic to reassert the rights and value of a human life. For once our judicially system is irreconcilably compromised, tyranny and mass injustice are merely a formality. If we as a nation of laws cannot demand accountability, deliver legal recompense with damning proof and grieve for an innocent woman gunned down in the prime of her life by a trespassing non-citizen with 7 felony convictions and deported 5 times, this nation is no better than a banana republic that claims witnessing a rape is a violation of one’s right to privacy. And if that’s now the universal standard of prescribed innocence, Europe would like to share their secrets of culture capitulation by teaching unreasonable Americans how not to trigger foreign militants into robbing, assaulting or killing their loved ones. As long as subjective advocacy perverts the rule of law and tangible evidence no longer indicative of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, “justice” will remain the battered political hostage of detached apologists who actually correlate forensic science with white privilege and “racism”.